Standardization and Adaptation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Standardization and Adaptation - Essay Example Finally, in 1961, the McDonald’s brothers sold the whole share to Mr. Kroc for $2.7 million. In 1967, McDonald’s had opted for its first international venture in Canada. Shortly after that, the license of Eastern Canada’s business of McDonald’s was bought by George Cohon, who had opened the first restaurant in the year 1968. The key to international success of McDonald’s was the use of Franchising. By franchising through the local people, the delivery of the products and the interpretation of their US brands to the local people regarding product and services became much easier. In this context, the report focuses on the adaptation and the standardization conformed by McDonald’s and how it had led to their success. Standardization Standardization signifies creation of a consistent way for carrying out procedures and tasks. Standardization can be related to any process that is being carried out in the organization such as, machinery standardiza tion, operation standardization, drawing standardization, inventory standardization, communication standardization and clerical process standardization. Operation standardization signifies that the operation can be conducted by any one. ... This is implemented within the organization to ensure that the end product of the organization is of consistent quality and is easily comparable to other products of same class. Standardization is seen to be adopted by various business processes when the organizations aim to achieve consistent level of quality. For instance, in case of fast food franchises, detailed outlines are provided regarding the preparation of food so that the customers experience the same taste and flavour, regardless of the franchise of the chain that they are visiting. Adaptation related to the environmental demands often requires non-trivial changes related to the structure, ideology and technology of the organization. There are several dimensions along which the organizational adaptation are implemented; for instance, the changes in the core features such as, technology along with changes in more peripheral characteristics such as, changes in the advisory team. Adaptation Adaptation is defined as the alter ations made to the system due to the forces that lead to the changes in the business climate. Organizational adaptation is defined as the response that the organization generates through changes in ideology, technology and structure due to the changes in the environmental opportunities and demand. The performance of the organization is dependent on a large number of factors that are related to the business environment and therefore, adaptation becomes important for the organization. This does not imply that an organization requires constant adaptation to the environment because if the business environment is stable, then it requires very little adaptation (D’aunno and Price, 1985; Huq, et al., 2003; Kammerlander, 2013).

Organizational Behavior Issues in Aussieco Essay Example for Free

Organizational Behavior Issues in Aussieco Essay Aussieco, an Australian company established as a small manufacturing and service operation company in 1962 is now a fully expanded company with 600 employees. The company built its reputation on a single product holding 90 per cent of the Australian market in the 1980. Over the years the market holding has gone down by 30 percent in spite of the product being unique and company facing little competition in the market (Jones,Gal, n. d) The downturn in Aussieco’s performance is mainly due to issues with the company’s management and organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior refers to ‘the understanding, prediction and management of human behavior in organizations’ (Luthans,2010). It is the study of individuals and their behavior in a work place. A company’s performance and outcome largely depends on its organizational behavior as it is an interdisciplinary field that includes sociology, psychology, communication and management. Aussieco’s organizational behavior issues can be explained through Henri Fayol’s 14 management principles. Henri Fayol’s theory of administration and organizational behavior focuses on the personal duties of management and managerial effectiveness which aussieco lacked. (Fayol,1971). The company has inexperienced staff and no specialization as major high authority staff is friends and family without skilled knowledge. The executive managing director is the owner’s nephew with no practical or industrial experience. The production supervisor is the production manager’s best friend who has little knowledge of the daily production tasks as he is a carpet fitter by qualification. Employees at the operative level are migrant labor mostly lacking formal qualification. On diversification, management failed to understand the changing market needs. Aussieco follows the power culture where control is centralized. The major motivational or driving force is fear (Luthans,2011). Suggestions and personal preferences are not welcomed. The owner-chairman reacts in a strong negative way if any manager’s opinion differentiates from his. This lack of consultation leads to staff feeling de motivated and undervalued. Though there has been division of labor and departmentalization in the company but the managers lack authority and responsibility. On the instance of owner accepting order from a bad debt customer without consulting the general manager shows lack of authority for the manager. Owner’s dictatorial attitude and ignorance of modern trends hold back the dedicated managers to improve and bring changes in the company’s working, as they are either fired from the job or become his instant enemies. The company lacks discipline and employee commitment. Lack of loyalty, no willingness to put high levels of effort, no belief in the company’s goals and vales and lack of faith in the management all together leads to all the issues of Aussieco. During lunch hours the senior management and sales staff have access to unlimited alcohol in the workplace. Assembly line workers underperform and hold back production with vague excuses. Subordination of individual interest over the company’s interest and goal is one of the major problems of Aussieco Employees overtime to get paid extra and not for productive outcomes. Also the senior programmer in spite of completing his work order uses his work holiday for personal matters. There is lack of equity and justice among the employees. The rule being everyone must vacate office during lunch break but exceptions for the senior management and sales staff that eat in the work place, operatives and other staff are allowed no food or drinks in the workplace. The migrant staff is treated well and better than its own internal staff. There are less internal promotions. High employee turnover, no stability of tenure of personnel is another major issue with Aussieco. To attain maximum productivity of personnel it is essential to have a stable workforce, which Aussieco lacks. There are frequent mass resignations in the company. No production manager lasts for more than 3 years in the company. The post of personnel manager is vacant since 2 months. Employees have no job security and thus are not fully committed to their work. This further increases the company’s costs of recruitment,selection and training. There is lack of motivation and initiative by the management for the welfare of the employees. There is lack of rewards, appraisal and bonus. The workshop roofs are without insulation and leak during heavy rain, no doors and filthy windows point toward bad and unhealthy working conditions. This even gave a loss of $AUS 500,000 when water leakage blew a computerized robot. No parking area provided for the employees, who reach frustrated to the office,which in turn shows in their slow performance. Lack of structured work, irregularity in work and no proper accounts and records maintained by the managers is another organizational issue for Aussieco. Though the record showed a stock of 4700 resistors but none could be located. A welder forgotten by the company after fitting of new automat is idle and has no contribution in the company. Reasons why these problems occur. One of the major reason for the organizational issues of aussieco is the employee attitude. Job satisfaction focuses on employee attitude and organizational commitment focuses on their attitude towards the organization. Job satisfaction is determined by how well the expectations of employees are met in return of their output (Luthans,2011). The aspects of job satisfication are not met by Aussieco. Employees of Aussieco are unsatisfied with the kind of work they get, the job provides less opportunities for learning and less responsibility. There is lack of remuneration and pay, less promotional opportunities, bad working conditions. This high level of job dissatisfaction of employees reflects in their low performance, company’s low profits, high employee turnover, high absenteeism and low level of commitment towards the company. The attitude of employees in an organization is largely influenced by the kind of environment the organization posses and further the attitude of employees affects their efficiency and performance at the organizational level. The environment of aussieco is not employee friendly thus employees have a negative attitude. Employee traits can be best explained by the Five factor model. Job performance is highly dependent on an individual’s conscientiousness (i. e dutifulness, persistence, industriousness) and emotional stability (i. anxiety, security, suspiciousness). In Aussieco employees had low conscientiousness and low emotional stability which affected their overall task performance and contextual performance. Organizational commitment is an important attitude toward the employers and the company. It is the extent to which we identify with them. Most of the employees, posses’ continuance organizational commitment, which is a calculative approach, where they chose to continue working in the company because they ‘have to’ rather than their want or obligation. This attitude is influenced by perceived costs of leaving the company, lack of opportunities, age, peer pressure, society expectations etc. Employees of Aussieco developed this attitude because of the mechanistic treatment they receive and lack of empathy from management. Autocracy is the concentration of power and authority in hands of one person. The management of Aussieco has an autocratic structure with the owner having unlimited power and absolute authority. There is a strict hierarchical structure; orders are sent from top level to bottom level. Ideas, personal opinions and suggestions are unwelcomed. In this management style managers believe workers must be controlled to ensure maximum productivity (Luthans,2011). Aussieco’s structure can be best explained by Douglas McGregor’s theory X. This theory represents an assumption of conflicting and negative working attitudes. The managers assume an average person dislikes work and will avoid it if possible, thus must be forced with threat of punishment to achieve organizational goals. An average person prefers to be directed and avoids responsibility. This approach encourages deadline and ultimatums, arrogant and demanding managers, mechanistic approach, no concern toward staff and one way communication (Jeremiah,2009). In Aussieco this approach resulted in a negative attitude by the employees, made them insecure and unhappy. Lack of Taylor’s scientific management. Frederik winslow taylor’s key idea was to improve industrial efficiency scientifically. He encouraged scientifically selecting and training workers and regularly monitoring their work to improve efficiency which also improves work man happiness and positivity (Lynch,1984). Aussieco lacked scientific selection, training and development of workmen and passively left them to train themselves. Managers did not supervise and provide instructions to the employees and there was no division of work between managers and workers. There was lack of specialization, standardized and systematic approach. The company continuously changed its suppliers for cheapest material available, a supplier providing 99. 5% quality level charging $20 per unit was replaced with a supplier charging $12per unit. The quality of the product suffered, increasing customer complaints and affecting the goodwill of the company negatively. There is lack of communication between departments, department managers and workers and senior management and managers. The senior management is unapproachable and not interested in the issues of the company and workers. Though Taylorism has faced criticism of exploitation, mechanistic approach etc but in relation to Aussieco, the company needs to adapt certain principles of Taylorism for a better organizational working. To conclude Ausseico’s major issue is organizational and management structure. The company should have a more humanistic and realistic approach with a right balance of authority and responsibility.

Effects of Lab by Inquiry in Educational Settings

Effects of Lab by Inquiry in Educational Settings Briana Bruske Abstract The purpose of this literature research was to distinguish the differences between verification and inquiry based laboratory experiments in educational settings, and their effect on student education. Examples of the incorporation of inquiry into course curriculum were found. The effect of inquiry on knowledge type gained by students, and classification of their laboratory reflective statements was analyzed based on results contained in various literature sources. Literature based survey results depicting student attitudes toward verification versus inquiry, and guided inquiry versus open inquiry were obtained and discussed. Suggestions for instructors as regards to the incorporation of inquiry into laboratory settings, and guidelines to do so were obtained and presented in this literature paper. It was determined that, though both verification and inquiry experiments have benefits, inquiry allows development of student skills that may not be otherwise obtained through a verification experiment, and allows for a more student-driven laboratory setting. Introduction: Experimenting in the lab is a way for students to learn hands-on about the concepts they cover in lecture.1 The average laboratory experiment falls within the category of â€Å"cookbook style,† or â€Å"verification experiment.† These terms will be used interchangeably throughout this research paper. A verification experiment consists of students following a list of instructions, provided to them by the instructor, to verify a concept learned in lecture.2 The laboratory instructions for verification experiments often follow a similar format to instructions in cookbooks; hence the term â€Å"cookbook style.† Various educational institutes have replaced a number of verification labs to incorporate lab by inquiry into chemistry courses.213 Lab by inquiry can be separated into two major categories. These categories are guided-inquiry and open-inquiry.1 Alan Colburn defines guided and open inquiry in his article, â€Å"An Inquiry Primer.†4 Guided inquiry consis ts of the instructor providing students with only a problem and the materials to solve it. Students devising their own laboratory procedures to solve the problem is a requirement for guided inquiry.4 Open inquiry is similar to guided inquiry, with the exception that students must come up with their own problem to solve along with their own procedure.4 Open inquiry involves a higher level of difficulty than guided inquiry, because students are provided with less information and guidance to devise problems and develop procedures. The National Scientific Education Standards state the importance of inquiry in learning scientific concepts, and outline the abilities required to do scientific inquiry. These abilities include identifying questions and concepts that guide investigation, designing and conducting investigations, using technology and mathematics to improve upon communications and investigations, formulation and revision of scientific explanations and models using evidence and logic, recognition and analysis of alternative explanations and models, communication and defense of scientific arguments, and understanding of scientific inquiry5. Appendix Research Involving the Creation of a Heat-Transfer Guided Inquiry Lab for Allied Health Students at Rochester Community and Technical College Undergraduate Research was done to create a heat-transfer guided inquiry based lab for Allied Health students at Rochester Community and Technical College, under the advising of Dr. Heather Sklenicka. The Allied Health student class did not have a heat-transfer lab, and no exposure to lab by inquiry. In this lab, students were given the opportunity to develop their own procedures to solve a given problem. The given problem applied to a real-life situation, which involved imagining they were opening their own coffee shops in a busy college town. Students had to determine the best container to sell their customers’ coffee in, i.e. the container that contained[ZJM3] heat most effectively. This required the students to test various coffee mugs, thermoses, and other containers for their efficiency in preventing the transfer of heat from the system to the surroundings. Students were asked various pre- and post-lab questions regarding the lab. Students were asked what their interest level in the lab was pre- and post-lab. Most students were interested in the topic of the lab prior to beginning experimentations, and remained interested or became more interested after the lab. Post-lab, students were asked whether the lab helped them further understand the concept of heat transfer as applied to a real-life situation, and all students surveyed that, in fact, it did. Students were asked if they had or planned to speak with others outside of lab about their experience with the lab, and most students surveyed that they had or planned to do so. When asked whether they enjoyed developing their own procedures, students surveyed that it was one of the most difficult parts of the lab, however, it was among one of their favorite portions of the lab. Results and Discussion: A group of researchers from the Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, studied the effects that different levels of inquiry had on General Chemistry students’ written lab reflections. Written lab reflections refer to post-lab responses regarding work done in lab, and analysis of data collected during experimentations. Figure 13 displays the results from this research of the various types of reflective statements shown by students and how they varied based on level of inquiry. The amount of evaluation statements varied little amongst the different types of labs. Evaluation statements consist of analysis of data obtained in lab.3 The largest portion of statements in written lab reflection fell under the category of knowledge statements. Knowledge statements consist of reflections regarding knowledge gained from lab experiments.3 Guided inquiry had the lowest amount of knowledge statements, likely due to a higher portion of improv ement statements. The amount of improvement statements in students’ written lab reflections varied the most among the different levels of inquiry in lab. Improvement statements consist of possible modifications that could be made to methods or the experiment itself.3 This is reasonable because, unlike verification experiments, inquiry requires students to develop their own procedures. This allows for a more significant amount of lab technique and procedural error, resulting in a more significant amount of inaccuracy in experimental data. Students must then explain error in results and this often consists of reflecting upon experimental mistakes and how improvements can be made to allow for improved experimental results. The University of Arizona researchers also focused on knowledge type gained from experiments based on students’ written reflections. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy6 was used to categorize students’ reflective statements reguarding knowledge gained from laboratory work.3 Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy can be broken down into four knowledge type categories; metacognitive, procedural, conceptual, and factual.6 Metacognitive can be described as the knowledge regarding cognition. The awarness of one’s own cognition falls under this category as well. Examples of metacognitive knowledge would be strategic knowledge, knowledge regarding cognitive tasks, consisting of appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge, and knowledge of oneself and abilities. Procedural knowledge consists of knowing how to go about a task. Examples of procedureal knowledge would be agorithms, techniques, and determination of when to use proper procedures.6 Factual knowledge is the basic in formation students’ must know to be familiar with a discipline and solve problems related to it. Examples of this would be knowledge of terminology, specific details, and basic information regarding a topic.6 Conceptual knowledge consists of the ability to see the connection between basic concepts and a larger picture or problem, allowing them to work together. Examples of this type of knowledge would be knowing certain classifications, principles, categories, and generalizations, as well as theories, structures, and models.6 Figure 23 depicts the level of the various types of knowledge gained in the laboratory based on students’ written reflections and the level in inquiry involved in the experiment. As one can see, students’ reflections in inquiry labs display a larger portion of metacognitive and procedural knowledge than the verification, while the verification lab reflections showed more factual and conceptual knowledge. In guided inquiry, students are pushed to focus more on the procedure and how one would go about solving a given problem. This requires a higher level of thinking and problem solving skills than that involved in a verification lab. A group[ZJM4] of researchers from a Texas University conducted surveys of students’ attitudes toward guided inquiry and open inquiry.1 Before conducting these surveys, students were tested as to whether they were able to correctly distinguish between guided inquiry and open inquiry scenarios. The surveys regarding attitudes toward guided inquiry and open inquiry labs were then given to 322 students who were able to correctly identify both laboratory scenarios.1 This legitimizes the results of the surveys because the 322 students surveyed more than likely understood exactly what the questions were asking, and were able to accurately state their opinion of guided and open inquiry labs. Table 1: Students’ Survey Statements Regarding Guided Inquiry1 Table 11 depicts the results of the survey regarding guided inquiry laboratories. The left statements correspond to positive attitudes while the right statements correspond to negative attitudes. Students generally had a positive attitude toward guided inquiry experiments. This is shown by the higher percentages agreeing with the left statements over the right statements. Table 2: Students’ Survey Statements Regarding Open Inquiry1 Table 21 depicts the results from the survey regarding open-inquiry laboratory experiments. The left and right statements were the same as those shown in the guided-inquiry survey (see Table 1). Students generally had a less positive attitude toward open-inquiry experiments when compared to guided inquiry. Table 3: Students’ Survey Statement Regarding Both Open and Guided Inquiry1 Table 31 displays the results from the survey regarding both open and guided inquiry laboratory experiments. Left statements generally corresponded to positive attitudes toward open inquiry labs while right statements corresponded to positive attitudes toward guided inquiry. Students’ survey answers generally favored guided inquiry over open inquiry. This is shown by the higher percentages in Table 3 agreeing with the right statements. Research, regarding the conversion of verification experiments to guided inquiry experiments in the general chemistry classroom, was conducted by students at the U.S. Millitary Academy (USMA) in West Point, New York.2 The focus on the scientific method within the general chemistry course offered much room for improvement of students’ critical thinking skills through guided inquiry experiments.2 Table 42 depicts the results from a survey of USMA general chemistry students after completion of guided inquiry laboratory experiments. The results from the USMA research survey are much in line with the results from the Texas University group regarding students’ attitudes toward guided inquiry (see Table 1). Students generally showed a positive attitude toward guided inquiry. Though there are no concrete rules to converting verification labs to inquiry experiments, the USMA research group put forth general guidelines to assist instructors in creating their own inquiry experiments or converting old verification style to inquiry format.2 Step 1 would be to select an experiment from the course curriculum. The experiment should include fairly simple and easy-to-understand concepts. Data should be collected using an uncomplicated apparatus, and allow for a quantitative and mathematical relationship between variables. Conclusions from the analysis of experimental data should be able to be tested.2 Step 2 would be to alter the introductory (pre-lab) material so that major concepts would not be taught before lab time.2 Students should learn concepts based on experiments in lab and interpretation of data collected. Step 3 would consist of significantly reducing the amount of detail put into procedural steps in the lab handout. This would require more thought on th e part of the students regarding how to collect relevant data and how to interpret it.2 Step 4 includes adding a step or procedure to the end of the lab, allowing students to authenticate their analysis of data and conclusions regarding important concepts.2 The last step would be to include short questions to guide student thoughts and include in the laboratory report.2 An example of a conversion of a verification experiment to guided inquiry can be found in Table 5.2 The USMA converted a freezing point depression verification experiment to a guided inquiry lab.2 There are clear differences shown between the verification and inquiry versions of the lab regarding purpose, schedule of lab time, objectives, laboratory introduction, procedure, and instructior and teaching assistant duties[ZJM5]. Conclusion: Both verification and inquiry experiments have benefits. However, inquiry can provide a more challenging laboratory experience for students and lead to development of skills that may not have been otherwise acquainted[ZJM6] with in cookbook or â€Å"verification† experiments. Based on various literature sources132 and undergraduate research done at Rochester Community and Technical College (see Appendix[ZJM7]), lab by inquiry is an effective way to teach students critical thinking and problem solving skills, while allowing students to discover concepts within a laboratory setting before learning them in lecture. Students generally have a positive attitude toward inquiry.12 Inquiry also allows for a break from the typical verification experiment, and a more student-driven laboratory setting. Instructors can incorporate inquiry into curriculum by the conversion of previously developed verification experiments into inquiry labs.2 References: (1) Chatterjee, S.; Williamson, V. M.; McCann, K.; Peck, M. L. J. Chem. Educ. 2009, 86, 1427. (2) Allen, J. B.; Barker, L. N.; Ramsden, J. H. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 533. (3) Xu, H.; Talanquer, V. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 21–28. (4) Colburn, A. Sci. Scope 2000, 23, 42–44. (5) Council, N. R. National science education standards; National Academy Press, 1996. (6) Krathwohl, D. R. Theory Pract. 2002, 41, 212–218. [ZJM1]When you elude to the fact that inquiry-based labs allow for better development of student skills, you might want to mention the measure(s) used to determine this. That way people know the assessment and can choose to read on from there. [ZJM2]I’d move the appendix to the end. It is really something appended to the article that doesn’t really belong in the flow of the article. [ZJM3]Retained? [ZJM4]Something you might consider is to add a few subheadings in the body of your discussion. You are really tackling two areas of inquiry labs: 1. The effectiveness of the labs and 2. Student attitudes toward inquiry. It might be nice to offset them with headings instead of just a paragraph indent to focus the reader’s attention even further. [ZJM5]Is there data on the effectiveness of these labs to corroborate your statements from the Arizona research group? [ZJM6]Acquired? [ZJM7]Do you have results in the form of tables/graphs for the research you did? It might help out here bridging your paper together†¦and in that case, you don’t necessarily need to call it an appendix either.

Essay --

NAME : SRINIVAS GADDI ID # 700604772 HOME WORK-III SUBJECT: DATA BASE THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 3.11) a) select distinct name from student natural join takes natural join course where dept_name="comp.sci". b) (select name, id from student natural join takes) minus (select id, name from student natural join takes where year c) select dept_name, max(salary) from instructor group by dept_name. d) select min(max_salary) from (select dept_name, max(salary) max_salary from instructor group by dept_name). 3.12 a) insert into course ( title, course_id, credits ,dept_name) values ('weekly seminar','CS-001',0,'comp.sci"). b) insert into section (sec_id,couse_id,year,semester) values('1','CS-001,2009 ,'autumn'). c) insert into takes(course_id,id,sec_id, year ,semester ) select 'cs-001',id,'1',2009,'autumn' from student where dept_name='comp.sci'.; d) delete from takes where (sec_id = '1') and (course_id = 'CS-001') and (year = 2009) and (semester = 'Fall') and (id in (select id from student where name = 'Chavez' )); e) delete from course where course_id ='cs-001'. this will executed successfully because section has foreign key which has on delete cascade constraints so when we try to delete any course it will not affect any table . f) delete from takes where course_id in (select course_id from course where lower(title) like '%database%'); 3.13) creation of person table:- create table person (driver_id varchar(25), name varchar(25), address varchar(25), primary key (driver_id)); creation of car table:- create table car (license varchar(25), model varchar(25), year int, primary key (license)); creation of accident table:- create table accident (rep... ...t title) from course)) 3.23) The similar attributes of takes table and section table form a foreign key of takes, referencing section. due to this , each takes column should match at most one section column ,and there should not be any extra columns in any group. These attributes cannot take on the null value, since they are part of the primary key of takes. Thus, joining section in the from clause should not reflect any loss of columns in any group. As a result, there would be no change in the result. 3.24) Use sub queries in place of where clause, with one of the sub queries having a second level sub query in the from clause as below. select distinct dept_name as D from instructor as A where (select sum(salary) from instructor where dept_name = D) >= (select avg (B) from (select sum(salary) as A from instructor group by dept_name));

Region IX – Zamboanga Peninsula

Recently we were told by our teacher to pay a visit at our campus on the occasion of a science fair giving each one of us one ticket. Accordingly, I went there and enjoyed a lot. What I saw was a fantastic arrangement of exhibits done by the students. I saw miniatures mostly about agriculture. One of the unique creations was a miniature of Terrace Farming, it is a piece of sloped plane that has been cut into a series of successively receding flat surfaces or platforms, which resemble steps, for the purposes of more effective farming.As we all know, one of the popular terraces is he Banana Rice Terraces (Haggard-Haggard Palatal). Some of the miniature was describing about Contour Plowing it is plowing across a slope following its elevation contour lines. This is the kind of agricultural solution used by most farmers as a tool for weed control, prevent soil erosion, and in some cases to promote plant growth. There was also a miniature about Interloping meaning growing two different veg etables in an area at the same time to save space. On the other miniature it was about how to farm organically.According to a book that I have read, eating organic odds may in fact, reduce the risk of heart attacks, strokes and cancer for individuals who abstain from consuming products produced by conventional farming methods. I also saw a miniature about animal farming. Mostly the main products of this Industry are meat, milk and eggs for human consumption. Here's to other miniature about urban Vile which pictures out the setting of an urban place or what we call a city where you can see tall buildings and establishments and a large crowd of people.In the contrary there was a miniature with details of a Rural place where It Is located outside the city with a low population density and small settlements. And lastly, one object drew my attention. It was about family farming. Like In my hometown we have a small farm at the back of our house, and planting Is one of our ways of bonding during weekends. One of the Important features of family farms Is the Intimate connection between families and farms which creates vital links between a farm and the food being grown. I miss home. I spent full 30 minutes rooming around the science fair enjoying such wonderful creations.

10 Great Biology Activities and Lessons

10 Great Biology Activities and Lessons Biology activities and lessons allow students to investigate and learn about biology through hands-on experience. Below is a list of 10 great biology activities and lessons for K-12 teachers and students. K-8 Activities and Lessons 1. Cells This is a diagram of an animal cell. colematt/iStock/Getty Images Plus   The Cell as a System: This activity enables students to explore the components of a cell and how they work together as a system. Objectives: Students will identify major cell components; know structures and functions of components; understand how the parts of a cell interact together. Resources:Cell Anatomy - Discover the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Cell Organelles - Learn about the types of organelles and their function within cells. 15 Differences Between Animal and Plant Cells - Identify 15 ways in which animal cells and plant cells differ from one another. 2. Mitosis The Cell Cycle. By Kelvinsong (Own work) [ CC0], via Wikimedia Commons Mitosis and Cell Division: This lesson introduces students to the process of cell mitosis. Objectives: Students will understand the processes of cell reproduction and chromosome replication. Resources: Mitosis - This stage-by-stage guide to mitosis describes the major events that occur in each mitotic stage. Mitosis Glossary - This glossary lists commonly used mitosis terms. Mitosis Quiz - This quiz is designed to test your knowledge of the mitotic process. 3. Meiosis Lily Anther Microsporocyte in Telophase II of Meiosis. Ed Reschke/Photolibrary/Getty Images Meiosis and Gamete Production: This activity helps students explore meiosis and sex cell production. Objectives: Students will describe the steps in meiosis and understand the difference between mitosis and meiosis. Resources:Stages of Meiosis - This illustrated guide describes each stage of meiosis. 7 Differences Between Mitosis and Meiosis - Discover 7 differences between the division processes of mitosis and meiosis. 4. Owl Pellet Dissection This image shows small animal bones found in an owl pellet.   Dave King/Dorling Kindersley/Getty Images Plus Dissecting Owl Pellets: This activity allows students to explore owl eating habits and digestion through dissecting owl pellets. Objectives: Students learn how to examine, gather, and interpret data through owl pellet dissections. Resources:Online Dissections - These virtual dissection resources allow you to experience actual dissections without all of the mess. 5. Photosynthesis A young boy studies photosynthesis and is using a microscope. Andrew Rich/Getty Images Photosynthesis and How Plants Make Food: This lesson explores photosynthesis and how plants use light to make food. Objectives: Students will discover how plants make food, transport water, and the importance of plants to the environment. Resources:The Magic of Photosynthesis - Discover how plants turn sunlight into energy. Plant Chloroplasts - Find out how chloroplasts make photosynthesis possible. Photosynthesis Quiz - Test your knowledge of photosynthesis by taking this quiz. 8-12 Activities and Lessons 1. Mendelian Genetics Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, vinegar fly).   Sinhyu/iStock/Getty Images Plus Using Drosophila to Teach Genetics: This activity is designed to help students apply basic genetics concepts to a living organism. Objective: Students learn how to use the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to apply knowledge of heredity and Mendelian genetics. Resources:Mendelian Genetics - Explore how traits are passed from parents to offspring. Genetic Dominance Patterns - Examine the differences among complete dominance, incomplete dominance, and co-dominance relationships. Polygenic Inheritance - Discover the types of traits that are determined by multiple genes. 2. Extracting DNA DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) molecule, illustration.   KTSDESIGN/Science Photo Library/Getty Images Extracting DNA: This activity is designed to help students learn about the structure and function of DNA through DNA extraction. Objectives: Students understand relationships between DNA, chromosomes, and genes. They understand how to extract DNA from living sources. Resources: DNA From a Banana - Try this simple experiment that demonstrates how to extract DNA from a banana. Make a DNA Model Using Candy - Discover a sweet and fun way to make a DNA model using candy. 3. The Ecology of Your Skin Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteria are part of the normal flora found in the body and on the skin.   Janice Haney Carr/ CDC Bacteria That Live on the Skin: In this activity, students discover the diverse organisms that live on the human body. Objectives: Students examine the relationship between humans and skin bacteria. Resources:Bacteria That Live on Your Skin - Discover 5 types of bacteria that live on your skin. Microbe Ecosystems of the Body - The human microbiome includes bacteria, viruses, fungi, and even mites. A Guide to Different Types of Pathogens - Learn about six types of pathogens that can make you sick. Top 5 Reasons to Wash Your Hands - Washing and drying your hands properly is a simple and effective way to prevent the spread of disease. 4. The Heart Human heart cross section showing blood circulation through the heart. jack0m/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Images Heart to Heart: This lesson helps students explore heart function, structure, and blood pumping activity. Objectives: Students explore the anatomy of the heart and blood circulation. Resources:Heart Anatomy - This guide provides and overview of the function and anatomy of the heart. Circulatory System - Learn about the pulmonary and systemic paths of blood circulation. 5. Cellular Respiration Cellular Respiration. Purestock/Getty Images ATP Please!: This lesson helps students explore the role of mitochondria in ATP production during aerobic cellular respiration. Objectives: Students will be able to identify the steps of ATP production and the function of cell mitochondria. Resources: Cellular Respiration - Discover how cells harvest the energy from the foods we eat. Glycolysis - This is the first step of cellular respiration where glucose is split into two molecules for the production of ATP. Citric Acid Cycle - Also known as the Krebs Cycle, this is the second step of cellular respiration. Electron Transport Chain - The majority of ATP production occurs in this final stage of cellular respiration. Mitochondria - These cell organelles are the sites of aerobic cellular respiration. Biology Experiments For information on science experiments and lab resources, see: Biology Science Project Ideas - Discover  great ideas for biology related science projects.Biology Lab Safety Rules - Follow these tips to learn how to stay safe in biology lab.

Medicare Eligibility Essay Example

Medicare Eligibility Essay Example Medicare Eligibility Paper Medicare Eligibility Paper The process of finding out if one is eligible for Medicare is to visit the website of Medicare at â€Å" medicare. gov† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). Immediately after that, one ought to look for the label which states, â€Å"Search Tools† on the left side of the main page (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). Pointing the cursor to the â€Å"Search Tools† will provide a selection consisting of thirteen choices, from which, one ought to pick and click â€Å"Find Out Your Medicare Eligibility† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). Required questions will then appear next and these are: 1) â€Å"Please enter your date of birth:†, wherein I answered â€Å"June 17, 1940† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 2) â€Å"Marital Status:†, wherein I answered â€Å"Married† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 3) â€Å"Tax Filing Status:† wherein I answered â€Å"Joint† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 4) â€Å"Type of Medicare Coverage:† wherein I answered â€Å"Part A B† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 5) â€Å"Do you have Medicaid? † wherein I answered â€Å"No† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 6) â€Å"Are you living outside the U. S.? † wherein I answered â€Å"No† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 7) â€Å"Household Income Range:† wherein I answered â€Å"$160,001 $200,000† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). 8) â€Å"Are you receiving health benefits through your current employer (or through your spouses current employer)? † wherein I answered â€Å"Yes† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). After answering all the question with such details, one will be able to confirm if he or she is eligible for Medicare especially if a statement like this will be issued in the end: â€Å"Based on your answers, the amount you will pay each month for your Medicare Part B premium is $105. 80 in 2007. This amount is based on your income† (US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2007). References US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services. (2007). Medicare. Retrieved November 19, 2007 from medicare. gov. /MedicareEligibility/home. asp? Q%7C10022%7Chsincome%5Fmarried=%24160%2C001+%2D+%24200%2C000Q%7C5%7Crcvg%5Fbnfts=Yesversion=defaultQ%7C3%7Cmdcd=Nobrowser=Firefox%7C2%7CWinXPQ%7C4%7Clvg%5Fotsd=NoQ%7C10020%7Cmrtl%5Fstus=Marriedlanguage=EnglishQ%7C1002%7Ccvrg%5Ftype=ABQ%7C10030%7Ctaxfiling%5Fstatus=JointQ%7C1%7Cbirth%5Fmonth=06Q%7C1%7Cbirth%5Fday=17Q%7C1%7Cbirth%5Fyear=1940qid_path=1%281%7E10020%29%7C3000%2810030%29%7C3%281002%7E3%7E4%7E10022%29%7C4%285%29%7C999%28999%29dest=NAV|Home|MyEnrollment|Results|EligibilityQuestions